Share article
Just a few years ago, personalization in the B2B environment was perceived as a competitive advantage. Today, it is rather a baseline requirement. Addressing by name, knowledge of the industry, company size, or purchase history – all of this has become a standard that customers automatically expect. The real shift, however, is happening elsewhere: companies are no longer looking for personalization, but for relevance. And the difference between these two concepts is fundamental.
Personalization works with data. Relevance works with understanding
Personalization is based on attributes – segment, role, industry, previous purchases. Relevance, on the other hand, requires context: at what stage of the decision-making process the customer is, what problem they are currently solving, and what internal pressures they are facing.
This shift is not accidental. B2B buyers today operate under strong pressure for efficiency, cost control, and demonstrable return on investment (ROI – Return on Investment). Research by Gartner shows that up to 77% of time in the buying process is spent by B2B buying groups on independent research without contact with a salesperson (Gartner, The B2B Buying Journey, 2019). In other words – a crucial part of the customer experience is created before the first direct contact.
And it is precisely in this phase that it is decided whether the communication is truly relevant.
An email beginning with “Dear Mr. Novák” and continuing with a general message is personalization. A study or whitepaper that reflects current regulatory changes in the customer’s industry and explains their specific impacts on the business is relevance.
The end of personas: the buying group decides
Another fundamental change is the structure of decision-making. B2B purchases are a collective process. According to Gartner, a typical buying group includes 6 to 10 stakeholders, each with different priorities and success metrics (Gartner, 2019).
- The CFO (Chief Financial Officer) addresses return and risks
- The IT department assesses integration and security
- Sales monitors the impact on pipeline and revenue
Relevance therefore cannot be based on a single “ideal persona.” It requires the ability to address multiple perspectives simultaneously – and to deliver to each of them answers to specific questions at the right moment.
Companies that systematically collect feedback across the buying journey – after a demo, during implementation, at contract renewal – gain a much more precise picture of where their communication ceases to be relevant. At that moment, Customer Experience (CX) stops being limited to operations and becomes a strategic tool for managing growth.
From segmentation to situational intelligence
Traditional segmentation by company size, revenue, or industry does not lose its importance. On its own, however, it is not enough. Relevance requires so-called situational intelligence – the ability to understand the current reality of the customer.
Is the company growing dynamically, or undergoing restructuring? Is it replacing an unsuccessful solution from a competitor? Is it facing regulatory pressure? These factors fundamentally influence how the customer perceives an offer – and yet they only rarely appear in structured CRM data.
This is where qualitative data and systematic analysis of themes come into play. According to a McKinsey study, companies that effectively combine quantitative and qualitative customer data achieve up to 85% higher sales growth than competitors (McKinsey, The value of getting personalization right, 2021). It is not about more data, but about deeper understanding.
Tools focused on customer feedback analysis (e.g. InsightSofa) make it possible to identify key motivations and barriers in individual segments and translate them into concrete changes – not only in marketing, but also in business processes or product strategy.
Relevance as the foundation of trust
In the B2B environment, trust is a key currency. And it does not arise from a company showing how much it knows about the customer. It arises from helping them make better decisions.
Relevant communication:
- simplifies complexity
- respects the customer’s time
- brings new insights instead of repeating product benefits
- evolves together with the relationship
According to the Edelman Trust Barometer (2023), 71% of B2B decision-makers consider a supplier’s ability to understand their business to be a key factor of trust. It is therefore not about “knowing the customer,” but about understanding their situation.
Companies that systematically measure and manage customer experience across the entire buying cycle gain a competitive advantage. Not because they personalize better. But because they understand better.
Personalization says: “We know who you are.”
Relevance says: “We understand what you are going through right now.”
And it is precisely in this difference that it is decided today who will succeed in B2B.
