Share article
Companies today invest in customer experience (Customer Experience, CX) more than ever before. According to data from Gartner, more than 80% of companies compete primarily on the basis of CX rather than price or product. Yet one paradox remains: while tools for managing CX are rapidly increasing, their actual use in companies often fails due to poor design of the system as a whole.
Experience from practice shows that what is decisive is not the number of tools, but their correct combination. It is precisely on this principle that the InsightSofa approach is built – not the maximization of functionalities, but their precise alignment with the reality of a specific company.
CX does not begin with technology, but with questions
Every meaningful CX system begins with diagnostics. Not technological, but business and organizational.
Crucial are questions that at first glance may seem trivial:
How many customers does the company have – and how many of them are actually reachable?
Does it have contact data available, or does it work only with part of the database?
Are all customer touchpoints defined – and especially the problematic ones?
How are segments of customers, products, or markets structured?
And how many people in the company will bear responsibility for CX?
It is precisely this initial analysis that often reveals fundamental weaknesses. For example, according to a McKinsey study (2022), more than 60% of companies have a problem with unifying data across touchpoints, which fundamentally limits their ability to manage customer experience systematically.
Choice of tools: less means more
There is today a wide range of tools on the market for collecting feedback – from email questionnaires through SMS, QR codes to kiosks at branches or web widgets. Advanced retention modules or tools for working with negative experience are also being added.
A key mistake that companies make is the effort to implement as many of these channels as possible at once.
An effective CX system, on the contrary, is based on selection. The choice must reflect:
- customer behavior (where they are willing to respond),
- the nature of the business (e.g. retail vs. B2B),
- and the company’s internal capacities.
For example, Forrester in its 2023 study states that companies that optimize the number of feedback channels (instead of maximizing them) achieve up to 25% higher return on investment in CX.
The end of NPS dominance: combined approaches are coming
Net Promoter Score (NPS) has long been considered the standard for measuring customer loyalty. Today, however, its role is weakening.
The reason is simple: a single indicator cannot capture the complexity of customer experience.
The modern approach therefore combines multiple metrics – for example NPS, Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT), and Customer Effort Score (CES). However, their interpretation remains a challenge.
This is precisely where space arises for aggregated indices, such as for example the InsightSofa Satisfaction Index (ISI), which make it possible to combine various data sources into one understandable indicator.
According to Harvard Business Review (Keiningham et al., 2020), companies using combined metrics have a 20–30% higher ability to predict real customer behavior than those that rely only on NPS.
CX as an organizational discipline, not a project
Technology is only one part of the equation. The second – and often underestimated – is the functioning of CX within the company itself.
The essential questions here are:
- Who bears responsibility for customer experience?
- How quickly and systematically is customer dissatisfaction resolved?
- How are employees motivated to improve CX?
Without clear anchoring in the organizational structure, even the best tool remains unused.
Gallup data (State of the Global Workplace, 2023) show that companies with high employee engagement achieve 10% higher customer loyalty. CX and Employee Experience (EX) therefore cannot be separated – they are two sides of the same coin.
Implementation: detail decides
The implementation of a CX system itself is often underestimated as a “technical phase.” In reality, it is a critical moment that determines the future adoption of the system.
It is not only about setting up software, but about:
- the formulation of questions (which must be understandable and actionable),
- design corresponding to the brand,
- correct setup of user roles,
- and above all about employee education.
The quality of questionnaires has a direct impact on the quality of data. A Qualtrics study (2022) shows that poorly formulated questions can reduce the usability of feedback by up to 40%.
Testing as a key phase of adoption
An interesting element of the InsightSofa approach is three-phase testing, which goes beyond standard technical verification.
1. Internal testing helps the team understand the system and remove technical shortcomings.
2. Company testing puts employees in the role of the customer – thereby building empathy.
3. A pilot with customers verifies whether the data actually make sense for decision-making.
This approach corresponds to the recommendations of MIT Sloan (2021), according to which the key to the success of CX initiatives is precisely the involvement of employees even before full launch.
CX as a competitive advantage – if done correctly
The final launch of the system is not the goal, but the beginning. Companies that manage to effectively integrate CX into everyday functioning gain an advantage that is difficult to replicate.
According to PwC (Future of Customer Experience Survey, 2023), 73% of customers are willing to pay more for a better experience. At the same time, however, more than half say that companies still do not meet their expectations.
The difference between these two numbers represents an opportunity.
Not for those who implement the most tools, but for those who are able to manage CX systematically – from correctly posed questions to everyday decision-making based on data.
Summary: A successful CX system does not arise from the purchase of technology, but from a combination of strategic thinking, correctly chosen tools, and disciplined implementation. Companies that understand this principle will gain not only better data – but above all more loyal customers and a more effective organization.
