{"id":7560,"date":"2026-09-04T07:00:27","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T05:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/?p=7560"},"modified":"2026-09-02T19:01:52","modified_gmt":"2026-09-02T17:01:52","slug":"jak-postavit-business-case-pro-cx-ktery-schvali-cfo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/jak-postavit-business-case-pro-cx-ktery-schvali-cfo\/","title":{"rendered":"Jak postavit business case pro CX, kter\u00fd schv\u00e1l\u00ed CFO"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>P\u0159ed p\u00e1r lety jsem pos\u00edlal finan\u010dn\u00edmu \u0159editeli e-mail, kde jsem \u017e\u00e1dal o rozpo\u010det na nov\u00fd syst\u00e9m zp\u011btn\u00e9 vazby. Napsal jsem tam, \u017ee z\u00e1kazn\u00edci <em>&#8222;c\u00edt\u00ed, \u017ee jim naslouch\u00e1me&#8220;<\/em> a \u017ee to <em>&#8222;pos\u00edl\u00ed vztah se zna\u010dkou&#8220;<\/em>. Odpov\u011b\u010f p\u0159i\u0161la za dvacet minut, jedna v\u011bta: <em>&#8222;Michale, a kolik n\u00e1m to vyd\u011bl\u00e1?&#8220;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Neum\u011bl jsem odpov\u011bd\u011bt. A od t\u00e9 doby v\u00edm, \u017ee tohle je ten moment, kter\u00fd rozhoduje o tom, jestli CX dostane rozpo\u010det, nebo skon\u010d\u00ed jako hezk\u00e1 prezentace v \u0161upl\u00edku.<\/p>\n<p>CX mana\u017ee\u0159i maj\u00ed skoro v\u017edy pravdu v tom, \u017ee lep\u0161\u00ed z\u00e1kaznick\u00e1 zku\u0161enost firm\u011b pom\u00e1h\u00e1. Probl\u00e9m je, \u017ee to \u0159\u00edkaj\u00ed jazykem, kter\u00e9mu CFO nerozum\u00ed, nebo mu nev\u011b\u0159\u00ed.<strong><em> &#8222;Z\u00e1kazn\u00edci budou spokojen\u011bj\u0161\u00ed&#8220;<\/em> nen\u00ed finan\u010dn\u00ed argument. Je to p\u0159\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/strong> A finan\u010dn\u00ed \u0159editel\u00e9 neschvaluj\u00ed p\u0159\u00e1n\u00ed, schvaluj\u00ed \u010d\u00edsla s n\u00e1vratnost\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p>Mimochodem, hezk\u00e1 n\u00e1hoda, proto\u017ee kolega Dan tady na X Pulse ned\u00e1vno psal p\u0159esn\u011b o tomhle rozporu, jenom z jin\u00e9ho konce. Psal o tom, \u017ee CX t\u00fdm m\u00e1 na tenhle probl\u00e9m vlastn\u011b metriku po ruce, jenom ji nepou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/metrika-kterou-ma-cx-tym-v-rukou-a-nepouziva-ji\/\">CLV, hodnotu z\u00e1kazn\u00edka za celou dobu vztahu<\/a>. Kdy\u017e jsem to \u010detl, m\u00e1lem jsem tleskal, proto\u017ee p\u0159esn\u011b tohle mi na porad\u00e1ch cel\u00e9 roky chyb\u011blo. Souhlas\u00edm s n\u00edm na sto procent, a je to skv\u011bl\u00fd za\u010d\u00e1tek. Ale jedna metrika je\u0161t\u011b nen\u00ed business case. Tenhle text jde o krok d\u00e1l: je to n\u00e1vod, jak se z jazyka CX p\u0159epnout do jazyka financ\u00ed kompletn\u011b, v\u010detn\u011b toho, jak si nechat spo\u010d\u00edtat n\u00e1vratnost a jak se vyhnout chyb\u00e1m, kv\u016fli kter\u00fdm CFO \u0159ekne ne. Ne proto, aby CX mana\u017ee\u0159i p\u0159estali mluvit o z\u00e1kazn\u00edc\u00edch, ale proto, aby jejich argumenty p\u0159e\u017eily prvn\u00ed ot\u00e1zku od CFO.<\/p>\n<h2>Zapome\u0148 na spokojenost, mluv o pen\u011bz\u00edch<\/h2>\n<p>Prvn\u00ed v\u011bc, kterou mus\u00ed\u0161 ud\u011blat, je p\u0159estat prod\u00e1vat pocit a za\u010d\u00edt prod\u00e1vat \u010dty\u0159i konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed finan\u010dn\u00ed p\u00e1ky. Ka\u017ed\u00e1 CX iniciativa, a\u0165 u\u017e je to nov\u00fd onboarding, rychlej\u0161\u00ed reklama\u010dn\u00ed proces nebo AI asistent v z\u00e1kaznick\u00e9 podpo\u0159e, se d\u00e1 napojit na aspo\u0148 jednu z nich.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Churn, tedy odchod z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f<\/strong>. Tohle je nejsiln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed p\u00e1ka, proto\u017ee dopad je vid\u011bt okam\u017eit\u011b ve v\u00fdnosech. Kdy\u017e spo\u010d\u00edt\u00e1\u0161, kolik z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f m\u011bs\u00ed\u010dn\u011b odejde a kolik ti to stoj\u00ed na ztracen\u00e9m obratu, dostane\u0161 \u010d\u00edslo, kter\u00e9 CFO okam\u017eit\u011b pochop\u00ed. Existuje dob\u0159e zn\u00e1m\u00e9 pravidlo z v\u00fdzkumu Fredericka Reichhelda (Bain &amp; Company), \u017ee <strong>zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed retence z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f o p\u011bt procentn\u00edch bod\u016f dok\u00e1\u017ee zv\u00fd\u0161it zisk o 25 a\u017e 95 procent<\/strong>, v z\u00e1vislosti na odv\u011btv\u00ed. Nen\u00ed to univerz\u00e1ln\u00ed konstanta, kterou nalep\u00ed\u0161 na ka\u017ed\u00fd byznys, ale je to d\u016fkaz, \u017ee i mal\u00e1 zm\u011bna v udr\u017een\u00ed z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f m\u00e1 nep\u0159im\u011b\u0159en\u011b velk\u00fd dopad na zisk. To je p\u0159esn\u011b ten typ v\u011bty, kterou CFO chce sly\u0161et.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Retence a expanze \u00fa\u010dtu.<\/strong> Z\u00e1kazn\u00edk, kter\u00fd z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1, obvykle taky nakupuje v\u00edc. Sleduj, jak se m\u011bn\u00ed hodnota z\u00e1kazn\u00edka (CLV, customer lifetime value, tedy kolik pen\u011bz od z\u00e1kazn\u00edka firma pr\u016fm\u011brn\u011b z\u00edsk\u00e1 za celou dobu vztahu) v z\u00e1vislosti na jeho zku\u0161enosti. Segmentuj z\u00e1kazn\u00edky podle sk\u00f3re spokojenosti nebo podle historie reklamac\u00ed a pod\u00edvej se, jestli ti s hor\u0161\u00ed zku\u0161enost\u00ed maj\u00ed ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed expanzi nebo nakupuj\u00ed m\u00e9n\u011b dopl\u0148kov\u00fdch slu\u017eeb. Skoro v\u017edy to tak je. A tady je to p\u0159esn\u011b to \u010d\u00edslo, kter\u00e9 Dan popisoval, a mus\u00edm \u0159\u00edct, \u017ee m\u00e1m radost, \u017ee jsme se v tom nez\u00e1visle potkali: <strong>CLV je jedna z m\u00e1la metrik, na kterou se CX t\u00fdm i CFO dok\u00e1\u017eou d\u00edvat spole\u010dn\u011b a doj\u00edt ke stejn\u00e9mu z\u00e1v\u011bru<\/strong>. Probl\u00e9m je, \u017ee ve spoust\u011b firem le\u017e\u00ed v tabulce na disku finan\u010dn\u00edho t\u00fdmu a CX specialista se k n\u00ed v\u016fbec nedostane. Pokud ji nem\u00e1\u0161, tohle je prvn\u00ed v\u011bc, o kterou si \u0159ekni, je\u0161t\u011b ne\u017e za\u010dne\u0161 stav\u011bt jak\u00fdkoliv business case.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Upsell a cross-sell.<\/strong> Spokojen\u00fd z\u00e1kazn\u00edk je ochotn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed koupit si vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed tarif nebo dopl\u0148kovou slu\u017ebu. Tohle se d\u00e1 m\u011b\u0159it docela p\u0159esn\u011b, pokud m\u00e1\u0161 CRM data propojen\u00e1 se zp\u011btnou vazbou.<\/p>\n<p><strong>N\u00e1klady na obsluhu (cost to serve)<\/strong>. Tohle je p\u00e1ka, kterou CX lid\u00e9 nej\u010dast\u011bji podce\u0148uj\u00ed, a p\u0159itom je pro CFO extr\u00e9mn\u011b \u010diteln\u00e1. Ka\u017ed\u00fd telefon\u00e1t na podporu, ka\u017ed\u00fd eskalovan\u00fd tiket, ka\u017ed\u00e9 opakovan\u00e9 vol\u00e1n\u00ed kv\u016fli stejn\u00e9mu probl\u00e9mu stoj\u00ed firmu konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed pen\u00edze. <strong>Kdy\u017e sn\u00ed\u017e\u00ed\u0161 po\u010det kontakt\u016f na podporu d\u00edky lep\u0161\u00edmu produktu nebo jasn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed komunikaci, u\u0161et\u0159\u00ed\u0161 n\u00e1klady, kter\u00e9 se daj\u00ed spo\u010d\u00edtat na hal\u00e9\u0159 p\u0159esn\u011b.<\/strong> Tohle je ostatn\u011b jeden z d\u016fvod\u016f, pro\u010d se \u010d\u00edsla jako FCR (first contact resolution, tedy pod\u00edl p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f vy\u0159e\u0161en\u00fdch na prvn\u00ed kontakt) daj\u00ed tak snadno p\u0159ev\u00e9st na finance. N\u00edzk\u00e9 FCR znamen\u00e1 opakovan\u00e9 kontakty, a opakovan\u00e9 kontakty znamenaj\u00ed zbyte\u010dn\u00e9 n\u00e1klady.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Kdy\u017e um\u00ed\u0161 svoji iniciativu za\u0159adit aspo\u0148 do jedn\u00e9 z t\u011bchto \u010dty\u0159 kategori\u00ed, m\u00e1\u0161 z\u00e1klad pro business case.<\/strong> Pokud ji tam za\u0159adit neum\u00ed\u0161, mo\u017en\u00e1 to nen\u00ed argument pro CFO, ale sp\u00ed\u0161 pro marketing nebo brand.<\/p>\n<h2>R\u00e1mec pro v\u00fdpo\u010det ROI: t\u0159i kroky, ne \u010darov\u00e1n\u00ed<\/h2>\n<p>N\u00e1vratnost investice (ROI, return on investment) do CX nen\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 \u010dern\u00e1 magie. Je to stejn\u00fd postup jako u jak\u00e9koliv jin\u00e9 firemn\u00ed investice, jenom se do n\u011bj mus\u00ed dostat spr\u00e1vn\u00e1 \u010d\u00edsla. Rozd\u011bl si to na t\u0159i kroky.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Krok 1: N\u00e1klady<\/strong>. Sepi\u0161 si v\u0161echno, co t\u011b to bude st\u00e1t. Nejenom licenci na software nebo cenu \u0161kolen\u00ed, ale i \u010das lid\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed na tom budou pracovat, n\u00e1klady na implementaci a p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00fd pokles produktivity v prvn\u00edch t\u00fddnech, kdy si t\u00fdm zvyk\u00e1 na novou v\u011bc. <strong>Tuhle chybu d\u011bl\u00e1 skoro ka\u017ed\u00fd: po\u010d\u00edt\u00e1 se jen &#8222;viditeln\u00e1&#8220; cena, tedy faktura od dodavatele, a zapom\u00edn\u00e1 se na \u010das intern\u00edch lid\u00ed<\/strong>. CFO tenhle rozd\u00edl vid\u00ed okam\u017eit\u011b a hned to podkope tvoji d\u016fv\u011bryhodnost.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Krok 2: P\u0159\u00ednosy.<\/strong> Tady si vezmi ty \u010dty\u0159i p\u00e1ky z p\u0159edchoz\u00ed kapitoly a spo\u010d\u00edtej u ka\u017ed\u00e9 konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed, by\u0165 konzervativn\u00ed sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159. Pokud si mysl\u00ed\u0161, \u017ee nov\u00e1 iniciativa sn\u00ed\u017e\u00ed churn o dva procentn\u00ed body, spo\u010d\u00edtej, co to znamen\u00e1 v korun\u00e1ch p\u0159i sou\u010dasn\u00e9 velikosti z\u00e1kaznick\u00e9 b\u00e1ze a pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9 hodnot\u011b z\u00e1kazn\u00edka. Pokud \u010dek\u00e1\u0161 sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed po\u010dtu kontakt\u016f na podporu o 15 procent, vyn\u00e1sob to pr\u016fm\u011brnou cenou jednoho kontaktu (ta se d\u00e1 spo\u010d\u00edtat z n\u00e1klad\u016f na t\u00fdm podpory d\u011bleno po\u010dtem vy\u0159e\u0161en\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f za rok).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Krok 3: Doba n\u00e1vratnosti.<\/strong> Spo\u010d\u00edtej, za jak dlouho se investice zaplat\u00ed sama. Tohle \u010d\u00edslo, tzv. payback period, je pro CFO \u010dasto d\u016fle\u017eit\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e \u010dist\u00fd ROI v procentech, proto\u017ee ukazuje riziko. Investice, kter\u00e1 se vr\u00e1t\u00ed za \u0161est m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f, je jin\u00e1 hra ne\u017e investice, kter\u00e1 se vr\u00e1t\u00ed za t\u0159i roky, i kdyby m\u011bly stejn\u00fd celkov\u00fd ROI.<\/p>\n<p>Zn\u00ed to jednodu\u0161e. Nen\u00ed. Nejt\u011b\u017e\u0161\u00ed \u010d\u00e1st je krok 2, tedy odhad p\u0159\u00ednos\u016f, proto\u017ee tam je nejv\u00edc prostoru pro sebeklam. <strong>Proto v\u017edycky po\u010d\u00edtej konzervativn\u011b a napi\u0161 k \u010d\u00edsl\u016fm rozsah, ne jedno magick\u00e9 \u010d\u00edslo.<\/strong> Rad\u0161i prezentuj rozsah <em>&#8222;\u00faspora 800 tis\u00edc a\u017e 1,4 milionu korun ro\u010dn\u011b&#8220;<\/em> ne\u017e <em>&#8222;\u00faspora 1,1 milionu korun&#8220;<\/em>. Rozsah ukazuje, \u017ee jsi o tom p\u0159em\u00fd\u0161lel realisticky, a ne \u017ee sis vybral \u010d\u00edslo, kter\u00e9 se ti hodilo do prezentace.<\/p>\n<h2>Chyby, kter\u00e9 CX lidi d\u011blaj\u00ed p\u0159ed veden\u00edm po\u0159\u00e1d dokola<\/h2>\n<p>Mluvil jsem ned\u00e1vno s kolegyn\u00ed, kter\u00e1 vedla CX v pom\u011brn\u011b velk\u00e9 retailov\u00e9 firm\u011b, a shodly jsme se, \u017ee se po\u0159\u00e1d opakuj\u00ed stejn\u00e9 t\u0159i chyby.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ta prvn\u00ed je argumentace p\u0159es spokojenost bez p\u0159evodu na pen\u00edze.<\/strong> NPS (Net Promoter Score, ukazatel m\u011b\u0159\u00edc\u00ed ochotu z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f doporu\u010dit firmu) nebo CSAT (customer satisfaction, spokojenost z\u00e1kazn\u00edka s konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed interakc\u00ed) samy o sob\u011b CFO nezaj\u00edmaj\u00ed. Zaj\u00edm\u00e1 ho, co se stane s v\u00fdnosy nebo n\u00e1klady, kdy\u017e se tato \u010d\u00edsla zlep\u0161\u00ed. Pokud to neum\u00ed\u0161 propojit, nech metriky mimo prvn\u00ed slide prezentace a za\u010dni rovnou finan\u010dn\u00edm dopadem.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Druh\u00e1 chyba je p\u0159ece\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159\u00ednos\u016f a podce\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1klad\u016f<\/strong>. Vid\u00edm to skoro v ka\u017ed\u00e9m business case, kter\u00fd proch\u00e1zel m\u00fdma rukama. CX lid\u00e9 maj\u00ed tendenci br\u00e1t nejoptimisti\u010dt\u011bj\u0161\u00ed sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159, proto\u017ee v\u011b\u0159\u00ed ve sv\u016fj projekt, co\u017e je lidsk\u00e9 a pochopiteln\u00e9, ale finan\u010dn\u011b nebezpe\u010dn\u00e9. CFO tyhle v\u011bci prokoukne, proto\u017ee je to jeho pr\u00e1ce d\u011blat p\u0159esn\u011b tohle ka\u017ed\u00fd den u des\u00edtek jin\u00fdch projekt\u016f. Jakmile jednou p\u0159istihne nadsazen\u00e9 \u010d\u00edslo, za\u010dne ned\u016fv\u011b\u0159ovat cel\u00e9mu materi\u00e1lu, i t\u011bm \u010d\u00e1stem, kter\u00e9 byly spr\u00e1vn\u011b.<\/p>\n<p><strong>T\u0159et\u00ed chyba je chyb\u011bj\u00edc\u00ed srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s alternativou nulov\u00e9 akce.<\/strong> Ot\u00e1zka nen\u00ed jenom <em>&#8222;kolik to stoj\u00ed a kolik to p\u0159inese&#8220;<\/em>, ale i <em>&#8222;kolik n\u00e1s bude st\u00e1t, kdy\u017e neud\u011bl\u00e1me nic&#8220;<\/em>. Pokud m\u00e1\u0161 data o tom, \u017ee churn roste nebo \u017ee n\u00e1klady na obsluhu se zvy\u0161uj\u00ed, tohle je p\u0159esn\u011b m\u00edsto, kam je d\u00e1t. Uk\u00e1zat CFO, \u017ee status quo taky n\u011bco stoj\u00ed, jenom se to nikde nevykazuje jako samostatn\u00e1 polo\u017eka, b\u00fdv\u00e1 siln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed argument ne\u017e jak\u00fdkoliv odhad p\u0159\u00ednosu.<\/p>\n<p>A je\u0161t\u011b jedna v\u011bc, kter\u00e1 nen\u00ed p\u0159\u00edmo chyba, ale skoro k business case pat\u0159\u00ed: nikdy nep\u0159ich\u00e1zej jen s \u010d\u00edslem. P\u0159ij\u010f s t\u00edm, jak bude\u0161 \u00fasp\u011bch m\u011b\u0159it po skon\u010den\u00ed projektu. CFO chce v\u011bd\u011bt, \u017ee se za t\u0159i, \u0161est a dvan\u00e1ct m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f sejdete znovu a porovn\u00e1te odhad se skute\u010dnost\u00ed. Tohle jedin\u00e9 dok\u00e1\u017ee rozhodnout, jestli ti p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u011b schv\u00e1l\u00ed rozpo\u010det rychleji, nebo jestli t\u011b znovu bude proh\u00e1n\u011bt detailn\u00edmi ot\u00e1zkami jako minule.<\/p>\n<h2>Business case na jednu str\u00e1nku<\/h2>\n<p>Tady je \u0161ablona, kterou pou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1m, kdy\u017e pot\u0159ebuji obh\u00e1jit CX investici. Klidn\u011b si ji zkop\u00edruj a uprav podle sv\u00e9ho byznysu, jenom pros\u00edm dosa\u010f re\u00e1ln\u00e1 \u010d\u00edsla ze svoj\u00ed firmy, ne ta z tohoto p\u0159\u00edkladu.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Iniciativa:<\/strong> Zaveden\u00ed proaktivn\u00edch notifikac\u00ed o stavu objedn\u00e1vky (SMS a e-mail) pro e-shop se 40 000 aktivn\u00edmi z\u00e1kazn\u00edky ro\u010dn\u011b.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Probl\u00e9m:<\/strong> 22 procent kontakt\u016f na z\u00e1kaznickou podporu se t\u00fdk\u00e1 dotazu &#8222;kde je moje objedn\u00e1vka&#8220;. Pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e1 cena jednoho kontaktu na podporu je 180 korun (mzdov\u00e9 n\u00e1klady, syst\u00e9my, \u010das vedouc\u00edho t\u00fdmu). Ro\u010dn\u011b to znamen\u00e1 p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b 26 400 zbyte\u010dn\u00fdch kontakt\u016f za 4,75 milionu korun.<\/p>\n<p><strong>N\u00e1klady investice:<\/strong> Licence na notifika\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1stroj 380 000 korun ro\u010dn\u011b, implementace a integrace s e-shopem 250 000 korun jednor\u00e1zov\u011b, intern\u00ed \u010das na nastaven\u00ed \u0161ablon a testov\u00e1n\u00ed odhadem 60 hodin. Celkem prvn\u00ed rok p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b 730 000 korun.<\/p>\n<p><strong>O\u010dek\u00e1van\u00fd p\u0159\u00ednos:<\/strong> Konzervativn\u00ed odhad sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed kontakt\u016f typu &#8222;kde je objedn\u00e1vka&#8220; o 60 procent (na z\u00e1klad\u011b zku\u0161enost\u00ed podobn\u00fdch implementac\u00ed v e-commerce) znamen\u00e1 \u00fasporu p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b 15 800 kontakt\u016f ro\u010dn\u011b, tedy 2,84 milionu korun v n\u00e1kladech na podporu. K tomu lze o\u010dek\u00e1vat m\u00edrn\u00e9 zlep\u0161en\u00ed retence, proto\u017ee z\u00e1kazn\u00edci s aktivn\u00ed komunikac\u00ed o objedn\u00e1vce m\u00edvaj\u00ed ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed m\u00edru reklamac\u00ed a vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed d\u016fv\u011bru ve zna\u010dku, ale tenhle efekt do v\u00fdpo\u010dtu ROI z\u00e1m\u011brn\u011b nepo\u010d\u00edt\u00e1m, proto\u017ee ho nedok\u00e1\u017eu spolehliv\u011b podlo\u017eit vlastn\u00edmi daty. Je to bonus, ne sou\u010d\u00e1st tvrzen\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Doba n\u00e1vratnosti:<\/strong> Investice 730 000 korun se vrac\u00ed z \u00faspory 2,84 milionu korun za necel\u00e9 4 m\u011bs\u00edce provozu.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jak budeme m\u011b\u0159it \u00fasp\u011bch:<\/strong> Sledov\u00e1n\u00ed pod\u00edlu kontakt\u016f typu <em>&#8222;kde je objedn\u00e1vka&#8220;<\/em> na celkov\u00e9m objemu podpory, m\u011b\u0159eno m\u011bs\u00ed\u010dn\u011b po dobu prvn\u00edho roku. Vyhodnocen\u00ed po 3 a 6 m\u011bs\u00edc\u00edch s re\u00e1ln\u00fdmi \u010d\u00edsly proti odhadu.<\/p>\n<p>V\u0161imni si, \u017ee v tomhle p\u0159\u00edkladu nikde nen\u00ed slovo <em>&#8222;spokojenost&#8220;<\/em> ani <em>&#8222;z\u00e1\u017eitek&#8220;<\/em>. Je tam probl\u00e9m, n\u00e1klady, konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed p\u0159\u00ednos, doba n\u00e1vratnosti a zp\u016fsob, jak to cel\u00e9 ov\u011b\u0159it. P\u0159esn\u011b tohle CFO pot\u0159ebuje vid\u011bt, aby \u0159ekl ano.<\/p>\n<h2>Na z\u00e1v\u011br<\/h2>\n<p>CX se vypl\u00e1c\u00ed, to nen\u00ed ot\u00e1zka. <strong>Ot\u00e1zka je, jestli to um\u00ed\u0161 dok\u00e1zat \u010d\u00edsly, kter\u00fdm v\u011b\u0159\u00ed \u010dlov\u011bk, jeho\u017e pr\u00e1ce je \u010d\u00edsla kontrolovat.<\/strong> Jakmile se nau\u010d\u00ed\u0161 mluvit \u0159e\u010d\u00ed financ\u00ed, p\u0159estane\u0161 prosit o rozpo\u010det a za\u010dne\u0161 p\u0159edkl\u00e1dat investi\u010dn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed. A to je p\u0159esn\u011b ten moment, kdy se z CX mana\u017eera st\u00e1v\u00e1 partner pro veden\u00ed firmy, ne jenom hlas z\u00e1kazn\u00edka, kter\u00e9ho si veden\u00ed vyslechne a pak stejn\u011b rozhodne podle \u010d\u00edsel od n\u011bkoho jin\u00e9ho.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>P\u0159ed p\u00e1r lety jsem pos\u00edlal finan\u010dn\u00edmu \u0159editeli e-mail, kde jsem  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":7561,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[55,72],"tags":[70],"class_list":["post-7560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-strategie","category-vsechny-clanky","tag-featured"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7560"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7560\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7565,"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7560\/revisions\/7565"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7561"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.insightsofa.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}